Comparison of Treatment Outcome Assessment for Class I Malocclusion Patients: Peer Assessment Rating versus American Board of Orthodontics-Objective Grading System
نویسندگان
چکیده
Department of Orthodontics, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, Uijeongbu, Department of Orthodontics, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Department of Dental Services Management and Informatics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea ORIGINAL ARTICLE
منابع مشابه
The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment
OBJECTIVE Given the considerable disagreement between the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation, we aimed to develop a novel assessment system-the Improvement and Completion of Outcome (ICO) index-to evaluate the outcome of orthodontic treatment. METHODS Sixteen criteria from 4 major categories were established to represent the pr...
متن کاملAssessment of the Knowledge of General Dentists Practicing in Tehran about Timing of Orthodontic Treatment
Objective: The ideal time to commence orthodontic treatment is very important. In Iran, due to the widely distributed population and low number and uneven distribution of orthodontists, general dental practitioners (GDPs) play an important role in proper treatment of occlusal and functional disorders and referring orthodontic patients to orthodontists. The purpose of this study was to assess ...
متن کاملOutcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
INTRODUCTION This treatment-outcome assessment objectively compares Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) treatment with braces. METHODS This study, a retrospective cohort analysis, was conducted in New York, NY, in 2004. Records from 2 groups of 48 patients (Invisalign and braces groups) were evaluated by using methods from the American Board of Orthodontics Phase III examination...
متن کاملValidity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
INTRODUCTION The objective of this validation study was to compare standard plaster models (the current gold standard for cast measurements) with their digital counterparts made with emodel software (version 6.0, GeoDigm, Chanhassen, Minn) for the analysis of tooth sizes and occlusal relationships--specifically the Bolton analysis and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index and their components....
متن کاملEvaluation of the severity of malocclusions in children affected by osteogenesis imperfecta with the peer assessment rating and discrepancy indexes.
INTRODUCTION Osteogenesis imperfecta is a heritable disorder affecting bone and tooth development. Malocclusion is frequent in those affected by osteogenesis imperfecta, but this has not been studied in detail. The purpose of this study was to describe and quantify the severity of malocclusions in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. METHODS Articulated dental casts were obtained from 49 pa...
متن کامل